Communicative Anxiety in English Language Learning: A Theoretical Review of AI-Mediated Safe Learning Environments
Main Article Content
Abstract
Communicative anxiety is a set of feelings and emotions, such as fear, insecurity, and tension, collectively known as language anxiety, which arise when speaking or interacting in a foreign language. In the process of learning English, students often face mental and emotional barriers when participating in oral activities in the classroom. During childhood and adolescence, stages that are particularly sensitive to the opinions of others, students may fear being judged or evaluated by their peers. This situation increases anxiety during communicative activities and limits the development of linguistic skills, especially oral expression. In recent years, technological advances in education have opened new perspectives for teaching and learning English. In the era of artificial intelligence, various programs, platforms, and applications have emerged to support students in developing communicative skills. For instance, AI chatbots allow learners to practice the language privately, receive immediate feedback without fear of judgment, and repeat exercises as needed, which can help reduce anxiety. The objective of this study is to analyze, through a literature review, the relationship between communicative anxiety in English language learning and the use of artificial intelligence tools such as chatbots. To achieve this, a documentary review of studies related to these topics in educational contexts was conducted. The reviewed studies indicate that emotional barriers, such as language anxiety, can negatively affect students’ performance in oral activities. However, the use of artificial intelligence tools, particularly chatbots, can create safer and less intimidating environments for language practice through individualized interaction and the absence.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Chen, J., Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2024). AI tools and learner emotions in English language learning: Anxiety, enjoyment, and use intention. Language Learning &
Technology Review.
Chocobar Reyes, E. J., González Rodríguez, L. I., & Barreda Medina, R. F. (2025). Inteligencia artificial generativa y habilidades comunicativas orales en
inglés: Revisión sistemática. Revista Arandu UTIC.
https://doi.org/10.69639/arandu.v12i3.1335
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University
Press.
Ding, D., & Yusof, A. M. B. (2025). Investigating the role of AI powered conversation bots in enhancing L2 speaking skills and reducing anxiety.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-05550-z
Ebadi, S., & Azizimajd, S. (2023). Barriers to oral communication in EFL classes: A meta-analysis. System.
Fan, J., & Zhang, L. (2024). Foreign language enjoyment and AI literacy in ESL/EFL learning. Language Teaching Research.
Fathi, H., Porte, G., & Wu, S. (2024). Chatbots as conversational partners: Anxiety reduction and engagement in L2 learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning.
Guo, Y., Lin, H., & Mubarok, F. (2023). Chatbot use in English debate simulations and speaking fluency outcomes. Journal of Language Technology and Education.
Han, S., & Ryu, J. (2024). Voice-based AI chatbot interventions and motivation in
English learning. Educational Technology & Society.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom
anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
Hanzawa, R. (2021). Classroom interaction barriers in EFL contexts: Anxiety and participation. English Language Teaching Journal.
Huang, Y. (2025). Foreign language classroom anxiety: Past developments and future innovations in the age of AI. Arts, Culture and Language.
https://doi.org/10.61173/8gt28b40
Jeon, J. (2022). Student interaction and anxiety reduction in chatbot supported
language environments. Smart Learning Environments.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00379-0
Kim, S., & Su, W. (2024). Reducing speaking anxiety with AI chatbots: Evidence from Korean language learners. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Li, X., Hegelheimer, V., & Yang, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence in language learning: A review of current applications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1775932
Luo, F., & Zou, Q. (2024). AI tools and emotional regulation in ESL classrooms. Applied Linguistics Review.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Methods and results in the study of anxiety and language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learning,
41(1), 85–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00677.x
Morales, L. E. G., & Calla, W. H. C. (2024). El uso de chatbots en el aprendizaje de idiomas: Revisión sistemática y perspectivas. Revista InveCom. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14532857
Padilla Chicaiza, V. A., et al. (2025). Personalización del aula de inglés con IA: Plataformas adaptativas. Revista Veritas de Difusão Científica, 6(2), 477–506.
https://doi.org/10.61616/rvdc.v6i2.643
Rodríguez García, C. C., Duarte Fuquen, L. F., & Ramírez Valencia, A. (2025). Foreign language speaking anxiety: Perceptions of EFL with Google Classroom. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies.
Susoy, Z. (2026). Reducing anxiety and enhancing performance: AI chatbots vs human facilitation on EFL speaking assessments. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1745942
Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state of the art analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 120–131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.002
Wiboolyasarin, W., et al. (2024). Designing chatbots in language classrooms: User experience insights. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 32.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00319-4
Zhang, S. (2025). AI chatbots in L2 writing: Anxiety, usefulness, and outcome.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-
026-06816-w